Working from Home: Threats and Opportunities for Businesses and Employee

It's probably one of the most contested topics at the moment, should we be getting back to big central offices, or continuing the work from home life that we're starting to become accustomed to.

Working from home (WFH) is obviously nothing new. Before Covid (BC if you will) WFH was slowly increasing with the Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures showing that in 2019 around 5% of people were mainly working from home, about 1.7 million people.

Then suddenly, overnight, businesses across the country saw this rise to 100%, or at least very close to that as we were ordered to work from home wherever possible. For most businesses this was a huge upheaval but it was amazing to see how well they and their employees adapted. The immediate switch to conference and video calls was almost seamless, with many wondering why they hadn't done this much sooner.

Possibly the biggest impact though has been on retail and hospitality businesses. As city centre's are left deserted all of the cafes, restaurants, pubs, bars, sandwich shops and pretty much anything else that relies on office workers are also left deserted. In the city suburbs, towns and villages it is quite a different story though. No matter where you work from, whether it be at home, in an office, or from a beach, you need to eat, drink, socialise, and exercise.

Businesses in the suburbs and villages, particularly those that can adapt quickly, have the opportunity to see great positives from lockdown and the sudden shift the WFH. Now while this may well come with some short term negative as businesses need to invest in new technology, processes and general ways of working, those that do this quickly and efficiently can see long term benefits in increased revenues, profits and a loyal customer base. In the first lockdown back in Spring it was quite obvious which businesses grasped the opportunity and which didn't.

Red Lion Badlesmere work from home.jpg

Where I lived in SW London of my three local pubs, only one adapted quickly and started offering take-aways from their now COVID-secure front door. Through the warm Spring and Summer months they seemingly always had a queue of thirsty residents. My two other locals on the other hand never opened and stayed shut until the lockdown ended later in the Summer. Now of course I don't know the individual financials of these businesses and whether the pub that opened made profit but on the surface at least they were getting cash flow and built a great reputation among locals.

I've seen great examples of businesses adapting to there customers changing work patterns, I particularly like the this one sent to me, from a pub in Kent, they say it's proven very popular. I also liked this idea in the FT of ice cream vans but for Pret-a-Manger coffees and sandwiches, driving around the suburbs delivering coffees and sandwiches to the hungry work from homers.

Local councils and broader government has a big part to play and can also realise some of opportunities too, in reduced traffic and pollution, improved local businesses, and ultimately happier residents. The Welsh Government have encouraged residents to work from home even as lockdown was ending, saying they ultimately aim to have 30% of people working from or near to home.

The city of Cardiff in Wales has adapted it's network of local libraries in to 'Hubs' where people can work from for some or all of the day, within easy walking or cycling distance from home. Towns and Cities can very easily remain a focus for peoples lives, if they grasp the opportunities.

There's a great opportunity for businesses in all sectors who are able to adapt to work from home (or even work from anywhere) practices, and that's the huge increase in the reachable talent pool. Where businesses may previously have limited their recruitment to their city or region, often within an hours commute of the office, they now have the whole country to recruit from, or if they're really ambitious the whole world. The opportunity here for businesses really can't be overstated, going from a talent pool of hundreds, maybe low thousands if they're lucky, to high thousands or even tens of thousands is huge. Not only allowing businesses to find the absolute best people but also at potentially a much more economic cost, keeping the CFO happy.

For employees the same opportunity presents itself, although there is also a bit of a threat there too. If you're looking for a job and you can work from home then the number of vacancies to choose from increases considerably. A quick search on Indeed for "Social Media Manager" in London brings up just over 80 positions but changing this to the whole of the UK brings another 100 vacancies to the table.

The threat for employees of course is that their own competition also greatly increases. As already discussed, businesses can recruit from a much wider pool and as always increased competition brings costs (salary) down too, a double hit for job seekers.

Let's also think about the wider threat in that businesses can pick from a global supply chain for tasks that may previously have been done in-house by a full time employee. Take graphic design as an example, where a team of graphic designers will have been employed in-house to work in the office, their tasks can now be easily outsourced to someone in Vietnam who advertises their services on sites like Fiverr. Why hire a graphic designer on £30k/year when you can get someone in Vietnam to do it for £4 a go?

As people spend less time and money on commuting there are great opportunities presented to spend that in other, more fulfilling ways. The £100s people spend each month on commuting can be spent on entertainment, experiences, better quality and healthier food, or invested in their and their families futures. The 10s of hours saved each week commuting can be spent on better quality time with family, on better sleep, or again invested to improve our physical and mental wellbeing through exercise or learning new skills. The work-life balance improvements can be significant for many.

And this brings us to another great opportunity - the environment. People working from home ultimately means reduced car journeys, less train trips, and fewer flights. Those times we do have to travel we'll spend less time in traffic, reducing our emissions. All helping us to improve the air we breath and the environment we leave for our older selves and future generations. Defra reported an average drop in Nitrous Oxide (NOx) of 30-40% in urban areas over the initial lockdown period.

Finally we come on to the fate of the office. Despite everything discussed above and what may seem obvious in that offices will disappear I actually believe that offices have a very bright future, if businesses are able to adapt and change sufficiently. Offices will remain but will become creative hubs. They will go from being places that individuals go to work at a desk to being places where teams come together to collaborate. Large floor plates filled with rows of desks will become flexible meeting rooms with whiteboard filled walls. Teams will come together in these spaces infrequently but will be hugely creative and productive when they do, being free from regular office distractions. Workshops, brainstorming sessions, project kick-offs, briefs and presentations will all take place over a day or two before everyone returns to their home offices to work on their individual tasks and outputs, perhaps coming back together in a month or so for a day to plan the next phase of work, before again heading home to crack on with their tasks.

Businesses that can adapt and enable this way of working will, I believe, have a very bright future.

In Summary:

  • Hospitality and retail businesses that can quickly adapt to changing consumer behaviour can realise some great opportunities at a local level.

  • Councils and broader government have a big role to play in enabling people to better work from home, and too could get great benefit.

  • A great opportunity for businesses is the hugely increased pool of people to recruit from, or outsource tasks to.

  • Similarly, for employees there's a great opportunity to increase the number of potential employers available to you.

  • This also represents a great threat to employees in that their jobs could be done by someone much cheaper in another part of the country, or even a different continent.

  • There's a good opportunity to improve peoples physical and mental wellbeing with improvements in work-life balance, more time to spend with family and friends, and less money spent on commuting.

  • The environmental impact could be very positive with fewer polluting journeys in to and out of towns and cities.

  • Offices are here to stay but will adapt in to being spaces that teams go for creative sessions, rather than individuals working at desks.

Chateaux AI - How technology is making wine better

“Wine is the only artwork you can drink”, as the famous quote goes, but where’s the border between art and science? As AgriTech (Agriculture Technology) is developing it is starting to encroach on this ancient art form. From the darkest reds of Bordeaux to the most crisp whites of Sancerre (and maybe even the Rose’s in the middle) vine yards are starting to explore the use of technology to help them get more consistent, higher, and healthier yields in order to maximise their efficiency and ultimately profits. A single bad year for a wine maker can put huge pressure on finances and even with high yields supermarkets demand low prices and consistent taste each and every year (P.S. don’t buy wine from supermarkets if you can help it) so getting this is really key for many of the larger grape growers.

As with pretty much every industry there’s some key developing technologies that are really starting to provide benefit. For wine making there’s two emerging as potential game changers: Drones & Satellites and Artificial Intelligence.

Drones & Satellites

I put Drones and Satellites under the same category as they’re both providing similar outcomes - high quality imagery across a broad range of the EM Spectrum, although there is recognition that they of course do this in different ways with their own benefits and disadvantages.

With the average vineyard in Europe measuring 1.3ha (13,000m2), and over 10ha when considering France on it’s own, knowing what’s going on in every corner can be extremely challenging and of course across that area conditions can vary greatly due to geography, soil, rainfall, sunshine, temperature, disease and so on.

This is where drones and satellites come in. Using these enablers with multi-spectral and other sensors allows growers to get measurements that are often beyond easy reach using traditional methods. For example, measuring soil moisture at varying depths across a whole vineyard, measuring temperature and humidity, measuring density patterns (typically referred to as the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)). While these have generally always been possible using human labour and some tools they are clearly time intensive tasks and still may not be at the resolution that’s really needed.

By making use of drones and satellites these measurements can be taken very accurately at potentially cm resolutions. This makes the spotting of patterns so much easier and therefore gaining actionable insight also so much easier. Where previously a grower would have to walk the vines and spot problems such as disease with their eyes they can now see problems perhaps before they’re visual and can see them on a smaller scale. This then means actions such as the use of fertilisers and pesticides can be used preventatively and on a much smaller scale, perhaps on just one vine rather than a whole area - reducing costs and environmental impact.

By measuring the vineyards NDVI more accurately and to a greater resolution growers can also harvest grapes at varying times to ensure that they have the best uniformity. Where typically a vineyard would pick everything at the same time, or perhaps split it in to large chunks, they can now see exactly which vines are ready for picking and which need more time. This allows wine makers to get grapes that are all at relatively the same maturity.

While measuring NDVI using satellites isn’t particularly new we are now seeing the use of higher resolution and cheaper satellites such as Cube Sats which is opening up the technique to ever more growers. The use of drones can be even more approachable, particularly for smaller vineyards where satellites don’t make economic sense.

Looking to the future we’re probably going to see the use satellites more and more in this area as they become much more economical and their capabilities continue to increase. We’re probably going to find that companies offering this ‘as a service’ will be the most successful with growers wanting insights and actions rather than just raw data. On the drone front we’ll probably see similar development. We’ll likely see the use of drone swarms so that more area can be covered quickly. We may also see the use of drones for spraying but realistically this needs significant improvements in battery technology first - 10-15 minute flight times at the moment make it not very viable unless you’re using a lot of drones at once.


Artificial Intelligence

Now I use the term AI in the loosest possible definition to basically mean data analysis with a bit of prediction. As grape growers make more use of technology the amount of data they collect and hold only increases. This data though can be hugely valuable when it’s used in Machine Learning algorithms, either as training data if historic or as data to form the basis of predictions if current.

Making use of the data collected from drones and satellites as discussed above is proving hugely valuable.

Predicting the yield of a vineyard each year is extremely important for growers and for the makers who rely on the grapes. Knowing not only the amount of grapes but also the quality can really help with predicting financials for the year and bad predictions can wipe out multiple years of profit as growers overstock on resources such as fertiliser and human capital or the other way not having enough barrels ready or people available to pick.

Unfortunately predicting yields is probably one of the hardest things to do in agriculture (and we must not forget wine making is a part of this industry). There are so many variables such as weather which in itself includes rainfall, temperature, humidity, wind that it can be difficult to predict early in the season what the yield will be at the end. Currently growers take samples from across the vineyard and assess measures such as weight, number of grapes per bunch and canopy growth, then extrapolating this across the whole vineyard to predict themselves what the yield may be, based on their years of experience. This gives a roughly 60-70% accuracy (surprisingly high I thought).

By taking historic measurements such as weather, soil data and yields, which most vineyards will have, they can use machine learning algorithms and data analysis to better predict yields from early measurements of the current season, based on what’s happened in previous years. By also making use of better long term weather/climate forecasts it’s been shown that you can accurately predict yields for the whole season with up to 90% accuracy.

As more and more data is collected, stored and analysed these algorithms will become ever more accurate and useful. Looking further towards the future we’ll see AI moving in to the production facilities with makers being better supported by data in their decision making as we learn more about what properties make wine taste good.

While many believe wine making is an art form, it is in fact much more like science.


Sources:

https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/five-ways-technology-is-changing-the-wine-we-drink

https://thegrapevinemagazine.net/article/drones-in-the-vineyard-uses-benefits-concerns-key-players/

https://spinoff.nasa.gov/spinoff2003/er_2.html

Cars are not 'Smartphones on wheels'

If I had a £ for every time someone said ’today’s cars are just smartphones on wheels’ I’d be able to afford that BMW M4 I’ve always been after. On the face of it it’s a reasonable statement to make. Cars today, and actually for the last 5+ years, have embedded SIMs for 3/4G connectivity, they have touch screens, they run apps, and using Apple Car Play or Android Auto looks exactly as your phone does. Below the surface though that statement couldn’t be more wrong, and here’s why.

Safety

One of the foremost considerations with developing cars is safety. Safety of the users (drivers and passengers) and those who may come in to contact with it. If a component in a car fails it can significantly impact the safety, particularly if it’s a safety critical component such as a tyre, airbag or brake. A component failing in a car could cause death. A component failing in a smartphone will cause inconvenience at most.

Lifecycle & Durability

This is probably one of the biggest differences between a car and a smartphone. A smartphone is designed to work as new for perhaps 2 to 3 years and work at all for perhaps 3 to 4 years, certainly less than 5 years. In reality most phones will last less than 3 years before being binned or traded in and then recycled. Cars on the other hand have to work almost as new for at least 5 years and have a full lifecycle spanning 15+ years. 

The environment in which they must operate for 15+ years is also extremely challenging. There’s no soft dry pocket for cars (unless you’re rare and have a car garage and actually use it for your car). Cars must operate in the coldest, wettest winter right through to the hottest, driest summers and all on pot hole filled roads. A smartphone does not.


Supportability

Related to their long lifecycle is the need to support models and the hundreds or thousands of components for a huge proportion of the vehicles expected life. Components must also be relatively easy to replace by either the owner or any garage, not just at main dealers. In many countries this is actually a legal requirement. Most smartphones, whilst maybe possible to repair at home are typically not. In fact you typically have to return it to the manufacturer where they’ll probably just give you a new device rather than repair it. Repairing it yourself may also void your warranty.

Complexity

An average modern high-end car has somewhere in the region of 100 million lines of code. The Android Operating System has 12 million line of code. Vehicle manufacturers today are more system designers and integrators than they’ve ever been. According to Toyota the average car has 30,000 components. An average smartphone has roughly 2000. Cars are hugely complex systems where as discussed previously if one were to fail the results could be catastrophic.

Business Environment

We see the smartphone industry now consolidating in to two major operating systems: iOS and Android, with the number of device manufacturers generally moving in to the single digits or low double digits perhaps (at least those manufacturers with any valuable market share). The car market on the other hand remains extremely competitive with hundreds of manufacturers, all with sizeable market share. 

Profit margins in the automotive world tend to be extremely low. I heard that on average a Ford dealer makes £200 profit on a brand new Fiesta (not sure I believe that 100% but I suspect it’s pretty low). Ford in Europe hasn’t made a profit for years whilst in the US manufacturers were bailed out by the Government during the last financial crisis.

Trends I'll be watching in 2019

The new year is a rather arbitrary time to do this but it is a useful marker and reminder to think about the future and particularly the next 12 months. So here’s a few things I’ll be keeping an eye on in 2019 (and beyond).

You’ll notice that there’s not much tech related below. 2019 will, I believe, be quite a boring year for technology with many of the developments being iterative rather than disruptive. 

4 day work week

The idea of a 4 day week being standard is not new but will start to take off in 2019 as employees and employers really start taking notice of general wellbeing and most importantly mental health. While it was once ’trendy’ to work 60 hours per week and almost kill yourself along the way the dial is now shifting the other way to more flexible and more productive working in fewer hours, prioritising personal and family time.

A few smaller companies have started experimenting with and trialling a 4 day work week in various guises but I think 2019 will see more and larger companies take the idea more seriously. At first this may be small trials lasting a few months or perhaps seasonally, we could quite easily see companies starting out by working a 4 day week in the summer months for example, just as Basecamp do.
A standard 4 day week has the potential to profoundly change the well being of employees and if the trials and studies are correct they can greatly improve productivity for companies too.

GenZ Workforce

If you thought Millennials entering the work place was difficult for businesses to handle then wait until the next generation, so called GenZ, start getting jobs. Those graduating university in 2019 will have been born in the late 1990’s and those getting jobs straight out of high school born in early 2000s. Many of these new employees will have lived much of their lives with the internet at their fingertips, many have a real sense of wellbeing, a huge understanding of mental health (at least compared to previous generations), and an almost intrinsic belief in equality, inclusion and environmental issues.

For employers this presents a huge opportunity to attract some amazing new talent, so long as they share the same values. Employers who don’t have the right IT, don’t strive for equality and inclusion, don’t have an intrinsic purpose, don’t take social responsibility seriously will all lose out on attracting these brilliant new people.

I’ve been sort of watching this play out a little in the latter half of 2018 and will most definitely be looking at it closely in 2019.

Retail Downturn

2018 has not been a great year for retail with many big name UK businesses going bust. Toys R Us, Maplin, House of Fraser, Evans Cycles and most recently HMV are just a few of a huge number of examples of retailers that have gone out of business in 2018. 

2019 will be an even more difficult environment for not only retail but all consumer focussed businesses, particularly those in the sort of discretionary spending arena such as restaurants and entertainment. Consumers in 2019 will be ever more cautious in their spending as Brexit plays out bu there will be a clear trend though in all of these struggling businesses, they will all be those who have not adapted to changes in consumer behaviour. They will nearly all be those who have a poor online offering and bad customer service such as difficult returns processes and poorly trained and demotivated staff. A shift towards 'direct to consumer’ models will also begin to hurt retailers.

2019 will really highlight the need for continual business change, and that doesn’t mean just sticking in a load of new technology, it means looking at processes and people/culture, making everything as easy as possible for the customer and asking ‘why does this step in the process exist?’ or even better ‘why does this whole process exist?’.

Let’s see how many businesses are ’shocked’ that they’ve gone out of business in 2019 despite not adapting over the last 5 years.

5G Devices

I couldn’t possibly write this and not talk about 5G could I. I wish I could though. Unless you’re a network operator, a regulator or involved in government policy you can absolutely ignore 5G in 2019. There will be 5G phones released by some big names like Samsung but real world networks will be few and far between. For consumers these new phones will provide little to no benefit, in fact they’ll probably be worse that today’s devices but for those operators, regulators and policy people it will give an opportunity to see what is possible in the real world with early 5G, see how consumers react, and see how their new networks operate testing new bits on a small number of keen consumers.

The Reality of the Pace of Change

“Unprecented pace of change”, “the pace of change is only getting faster”, “the pace of change is unmanageable”. These are phrases used so often in our industry and many others I suspect, but what’s the reality and what do people really mean when they say it.

While I think it’s true that the general pace of change in technology is staggering I don’t believe that the pace of change is increasing or that’s unmanageable. In fact I think changes are entirely predictable. Particularly in the general areas I’m focussed on; Telecoms and general consumer technology.

If you look at consumer technology we haven’t actually seen major change in the last 5-10 years. The first iPhone was released in 2007 and even before that Blackberries were doing email and web browsing with their sort-of-smarphones in the very late 90s to early 2000s, getting close to 20 years ago. While of course smartphone use has grown significantly and the hardware and software has continued to develop they’re fundamentally similar devices that they were 10+ years ago. The development of these devices has been entirely predictable. Since the first iPhone in 2007 there’s been a new model every single year, often pretty much on the same date. Like clockwork.

I’m going to put my neck on the line and say that the next model will be announced in September 2018, what do you think?

The same is pretty much true too for Android based handsets such as those from Samsung and HTC.

While we don’t know for sure what new features each new model will have there’s always a pretty big pot of rumours swirling in the months before a release, and actually a lot of them are pretty accurate, often from very targeted ‘leaks’ from the company themselves. Most of these hardware changes actually have little impact on what we do. A lot of new models are simply faster and thinner with better batteries, screens and cameras, with nothing particularly fundamental changing in the hardware.

Looking at the software there are clearly more fundamental changes happening particularly with developments in AI techniques allowing advanced machine vision and speech recognition paving the way for some interesting new use cases. We also 

However, if we look at the things that the majority of consumers are doing it hasn’t really changed that much in the last 5-10 years, similarly to hardware. Ultimately humans are still doing the same things they’ve always done - communicate, shop, be entertained, learn, earn money. It’s just that they’re now doing it on this thing called the Internet (which has been around in a commercial form since the early 1990s by the way).

Today’s most popular communication method is probably WhatsApp on which over 55 billion messages are sent per day. WhatsApp was created in 2009, nearly 10 years ago and was acquired by Facebook in 2014, nearly 5 years ago. It’s estimated that WhatsApp surpassed SMS for example back in 2014 in terms of number of daily messages sent. WhatsApp has probably been the dominant consumer communication method since then. The main apps of Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, Instagram (all owned by Facebook), iMessage, Telegram, Viber etc have all been around for at least the last 5 years. It is true though that these apps/services do change themselves quite often with new features and changes to how they work from a technical point of view by utilising new protocols, adding features and so on.

In terms of communication it’s always useful to remember that humans only have five senses, so realistically any form of communication will be limited to sight (text, pictures, videos) and sound. I can’t particularly imagine any communication apps being based on smell, touch, or taste. So the opportunities for significant change are extremely limited and quite predictable.

In terms of Telecoms we tend to see similar timescales for change. Approximately every 10 years there’s a new generation of 3GPP standard (3G in 2000, LTE (4G) in 2008/9, 5G in 2018), the development of which takes place over months to years. Between these major generations there can be quite significant releases but network operators still tend to take years before implementing these releases on their networks as the costs can be quite significant and testing quite intensive. The telecoms industry is heavily regulated, competitive, expensive, and average revenues have been dropping for many years which means there’s not significant outside investment (at least relative to other industries), further adding to the difficulties of deploying new network technologies and new entrants entering the market. Now it will be interesting to see how technologies such as network virtualisation change this as we progress (slowly) towards 5G networks.

People use the pace of change argument to put the blame for their lack of ability to change on to someone else. By blaming the pace of change they shift attention to the world outside of their organisation… "it’s somebody else’s fault, they’re developing things too quickly, they need to slow down to match our speed of change” is what people actually mean when they talk about the increasing pace of change.